the last city council have approved the agenda item with which it was established the Special.
During the last election campaign (I mean the real and eternal, not the fantasy starring some of our local politicians for years ...), we talked exclusively to the citizens of our program, distinguishing them from those who merely throw mud on the media for his words. The establishment of the Special was and is one of the cornerstones of our program of government ,.... that program, which allowed us to win.
However, the ' argument has led to a number of criticisms from some politicians. Well, I think these criticisms are at least paradoxical: they are usually blamed those authorities who do not keep their promises to citizens, but Latimer is the opposite. The criticisms are made because we IMPLEMENTING THE POINTS FROM OUR PROGRAM! If I wanted to express myself in "newspeak" I would say that this is the usual demagogic manipulation without substance ... However, preferring to express myself with a common language - being before all things an ordinary person, though invested with public office - say simply that this is absurd. And, of course, to be sad.
Sad because, as I said in council, no one can speak of "missing", "saving" and "unnecessary operations" before the human being; there are dramatic socio-health in front of which is simply cynical and inhumane to do so.
In the journal of the South of 22/11/2010 and 26/11/2010 the Christmas adviser talks about saving inviting us to avoid "wasteful expenditures and" not to "stay within the Stability Pact" ... Its a shame that the director Christmas in the City Council on 1 July 2010, had asked the majority of "contract of mortgage even at the cost to exceed the stability pact, while completing the work of the sports hall" (you can listen to registration of the municipal council 01/07/2010 on site " idea radio in the world"). But how? For the venue we can borrow and stay within the Stability Pact and for people in need of assistance we talk about savings?
I would remind you that your Christmas in the City Council of 21 / 02/2002 (administration when he was a member D'Ippolito) quality in relation to social services commissioner saying he supports the establishment of an Institute Catherine Scazzeri RSA own the building ... the same what that we did. Why now is the contrary?
As local government we just entrust to the public social welfare services of this kind because, unlike a private company - whose natural inclination is to get the profits - the 'Special Company will point to only a balanced budget. The normal consequence will be a better service at a price equal to or even lower.
conclude by pointing out some inaccuracies in the aforementioned article in the journal , Signed by Franco Giuliano
1) Right to limit the initial costs to the Board for the first year of operation will have no reward and it will carry out various tasks under free (Article 45 paragraph 2 of the Statute of the Special), and thereafter the amount of each component will be limited to only "attendance", the extent of which will be annually deliberate in council (Article 16 paragraph 4 of the Statute of the Special).
2 ) In the journal you can read the comments of the leader of the PDL Region Antonio De Caro, who spoke of a "college of reviewers" really special in the Company has only one auditor (art. 21 paragraph 1 of the Statute of the Special), and his compensation will be decided by the Board on the basis of available resources in the budget of the Special (Article 21 paragraph 5 of the Statute of the Special). ;
3) the Special will have its own legal personality and entrepreneurial no economic significance to the town of Latimer (Article 2 of the Statute of the Special).
So our challenge is aimed at a real increase in the quality of social services, the Special is a project we believe in and which - considering the results of the last elections - probably also believes the city of Latimer.
Daniel
0 comments:
Post a Comment