Cubase 3 Dongle Emulator Mac Osx

INQUISITION INFORMS .....

Yesterday I wrote a post titled "The informed about the latest" in which prompt us to reflect on how the press is too often, overly partisan; in my speech I talked about how the various local politicians, our adversaries , had been able to benefit from the pages of the Journal of the brush and a journalist for his harshly criticize the administration of which I belong. Adds - and this was the key point - that when my turn I tried to send my reply just to clarify some points ... this was ignored by both the newspaper that the journalist concerned.

This morning, the lawyer Leopoldo Calo, after reading my post INFORMATION OF LAST ", expressed his solidarity with me posting my comments on his blog, Latimer Open . What follows is the comment that produced Giuliano Franco, journalist of the Journal of the South, Latimer Open Blog:

Dear Leopoldo, in response to "your" introduction of the intervention counselor, just to say (and therefore respond also to the Council that there is ever sent any official approval of the statement at gazzetta.it) that Mr. Pascariello adviser has written on two long comments on the website of the Journal, both published. It seems, therefore, that the right of reply has been met, but twice. Regarding the statement of the PDL (published as a link to our news) was added simply because we have received, also was a text which contained new elements to the debate at the signing of that whole group council, that is, more advisers to that time I had expressed before, as he had done several times (the Official) Mr. adviser of the majority Pascariello, which there appears to be the "spokesman" of the ... entire majority. Thanks. fg

Giuliano said in his comment that my statement would never come.

I actually sent the statement in question by e-mail at 17:10 on 26 November to the following email address: r @ edazione.brindisi gazzettamezzogiorno.it

In addition, my mail box informs me that the message was successfully sent (which, inter alia, demonstrated by the fact that the Journal was not the only recipient, other recipients was the voice of Latimer, who instead received and published my press release .)

Giuliano adds that were published two of my comments and therefore has been granted the right of reply. Yes, it's true. But it is also true that other comments were published Christmas, author of the press releases.

And there's some here. Today the good Giuliano was the author of a new article to the administration and against the company are cited article where special ... Christmas, Jewel, Roger, Decaro ... but the "lordship Pascariello" (as defined by me Felt sarcasm our local ...)... well Pascariello no!

Pascariello continues to be censored and de-legitimized in keeping with this modern inquisition local ...

A curiosity. For the uninitiated Franco Giuliano was going to stand as mayor of Latimer in the last elections. We are confident that his "journalism" is free from any grudges ...?

Daniel

Whats The Best Way To Grout A Wall

INFORMATION FOR ... "LAST"

I am seriously worried about what is happening to information of our country ... and I'm not referring to Italy, but in reality much smaller: the city of Latimer .

First I make a reflection. What is an article?

I think that article is nothing but a text, and text, by its nature, is a work that has two authors: he writes - and is limited to tell a history without reveal their thoughts - and anyone who reads - and that's opinion based on their own ideas and values.

But is it really? The articles reflect really just the facts? Unfortunately no, the journalists of the past, the reporters, who told stories trying not to be confused with their opinions ... no longer exist.

today's newspapers are free and full of reporters full of opinion, that tell the facts soaked personal considerations ... An example?

last city council have approved one of the key points of our program, the establishment of the special. But already the morning preceding the City Council - November 22 - The Journal of the South had published on its website an article by Franco Giuliano; the article in question, the tone decidedly critical of the majority of ' special agency, contained statements - clearly contrary - issued by the parent council of the PDL Pine Christmas.

Four days later, on the afternoon of November 26 last year, I happened to read a new article on the website of Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno, also signed by Frank Giuliano. The article this time, besides containing statements by the new adviser Christmas (PDL), reported also that of advisor Jewel (PD) and the Regional Council Decaro (PD ),.... Needless to say, they were all very critical of ' special company and the majority. The article in question also was full of inaccuracies, which is why I decided to immediately send a reply on behalf of the entire majority.

Then, at 17:10 on 26 November, Only the intent to clarify and not to make propaganda, I sent e-mail my statement to the Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno, the new daily and the site of Puglia The Voice of Latimer.

Well, apart from the Voice of Latimer (thanks to the heart) think that my statement has been invested with the honor of being published at least one of the two heads? Of course not, but you will have already understood this, because otherwise I would not have written this post ...

La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno, however, went even further, because not only did not publish my point of view (denying in fact the right of reply), but the next day, 27/11/2010, issued a new press always produced by the group PDL Latimer and of course always critical of the majority and of the special ... In short, PDL 3 - 0 Pascariello ....

Then I asked myself, why people like Christmas, Jewel, Decaro can have their say and those who think differently can not do? Why I have not been granted the right of reply? Why is denied contradictory? Maybe because I'm not a political important, but just an ordinary citizen in his first administrative experience? I must therefore think that the ordinary citizen, "the last" (as would a dear friend), may not have the right to voice his opinion?

For this reason I decided to write to you, ordinary citizens like me, I ask you to read this post and send to your friends, I ask you to give maximum visibility to write comments, talk in the streets, on social networks, the phone ... I ask you not to jump to conclusions, but to build a complete picture listening to me too. I ask you to do what they should do, but do not, the local newspapers: the possibility to everyone - whoever they may be - to have its say and to be heard.

I have always believed that every point of view deserves to have equal visibility, to allow the listener (or in this case, the reader) to get the views that they consider most just based on a complete picture.

Voltaire said: "I do not agree what you say but defend to the death the freedom that you have to externalize your thinking" ... Perhaps Voltaire was just a poor idealist, a believer of equality and freedom of thought, an ordinary citizen ...

... or a "last", if you like ...

Daniel

Pokemon Yellow 2010 Save

FACTORY OF IDEAS

the last city council have approved the agenda item with which it was established the Special.

During the last election campaign (I mean the real and eternal, not the fantasy starring some of our local politicians for years ...), we talked exclusively to the citizens of our program, distinguishing them from those who merely throw mud on the media for his words. The establishment of the Special was and is one of the cornerstones of our program of government ,.... that program, which allowed us to win.

However, the ' argument has led to a number of criticisms from some politicians. Well, I think these criticisms are at least paradoxical: they are usually blamed those authorities who do not keep their promises to citizens, but Latimer is the opposite. The criticisms are made because we IMPLEMENTING THE POINTS FROM OUR PROGRAM! If I wanted to express myself in "newspeak" I would say that this is the usual demagogic manipulation without substance ... However, preferring to express myself with a common language - being before all things an ordinary person, though invested with public office - say simply that this is absurd. And, of course, to be sad.

Sad because, as I said in council, no one can speak of "missing", "saving" and "unnecessary operations" before the human being; there are dramatic socio-health in front of which is simply cynical and inhumane to do so.

In the journal of the South of 22/11/2010 and 26/11/2010 the Christmas adviser talks about saving inviting us to avoid "wasteful expenditures and" not to "stay within the Stability Pact" ... Its a shame that the director Christmas in the City Council on 1 July 2010, had asked the majority of "contract of mortgage even at the cost to exceed the stability pact, while completing the work of the sports hall" (you can listen to registration of the municipal council 01/07/2010 on site " idea radio in the world"). But how? For the venue we can borrow and stay within the Stability Pact and for people in need of assistance we talk about savings?

I would remind you that your Christmas in the City Council of 21 / 02/2002 (administration when he was a member D'Ippolito) quality in relation to social services commissioner saying he supports the establishment of an Institute Catherine Scazzeri RSA own the building ... the same what that we did. Why now is the contrary?

As local government we just entrust to the public social welfare services of this kind because, unlike a private company - whose natural inclination is to get the profits - the 'Special Company will point to only a balanced budget. The normal consequence will be a better service at a price equal to or even lower.

conclude by pointing out some inaccuracies in the aforementioned article in the journal , Signed by Franco Giuliano

1) Right to limit the initial costs to the Board for the first year of operation will have no reward and it will carry out various tasks under free (Article 45 paragraph 2 of the Statute of the Special), and thereafter the amount of each component will be limited to only "attendance", the extent of which will be annually deliberate in council (Article 16 paragraph 4 of the Statute of the Special).

2 ) In the journal you can read the comments of the leader of the PDL Region Antonio De Caro, who spoke of a "college of reviewers" really special in the Company has only one auditor (art. 21 paragraph 1 of the Statute of the Special), and his compensation will be decided by the Board on the basis of available resources in the budget of the Special (Article 21 paragraph 5 of the Statute of the Special). ;

3) the Special will have its own legal personality and entrepreneurial no economic significance to the town of Latimer (Article 2 of the Statute of the Special).

So our challenge is aimed at a real increase in the quality of social services, the Special is a project we believe in and which - considering the results of the last elections - probably also believes the city of Latimer.

Daniel