Ut Dorms With Private Rooms

THE QUIET AFTER THE PROTEST

What is the complaints that one of the many consequences and the numerous expressions of comparison?

As we know the group

UDC Board expressed his protest by refusing to participate in the City Council yesterday. I wonder though, since it is political protest - and thus result and expression of political debate - as the best theater of the city council to explain the same content?

I firmly believe that the council is the only real frame of comparison and, in its various expressions, even the protest. I think that each councilor has a moral duty to participate in the work of the council and express, with political responsibility, their thoughts ... or if its protest, ... regardless of party orders and textures. If for no other reason than to those citizens that their votes have made that option possible.

I find it illogical, then, and sadly ironic, failure to submit to the UDC group City Council yesterday. After all, what sense to desert the place .... in protest of the protest? It would be like not to eat when hungry and refuse to drink when thirsty.

There must also be said that the local UDC has now used to prefer the city walls (when putting up their posters in sign of dissent) to the municipal council (as early as June 2010, and again in protest, the group left the UDC public fora).
So for now let's enjoy what is now quiet. .. after the protest.


... at least until the next manifesto.


Daniel

Mysore Mallige Bluefilm Vidio

The question

few hours ago, the news site VOICE Latimer issued a press release produced by the group Board UDC, UDC targati essentially politicians announced that they will not participate at City Council tomorrow because ..... well why do not you understand ... UDC's position is not "all clear," the communiqué reads:

"the municipal council of the UDC group - suspending any assessment in order content of the measure of housing development in the district of "Scaramouche" - announced its decision not to participate, in protest at the next meeting of the City Council. "

Strange, because I remembered that in January 2010 just one of them wrote:

"because of the state of severe crisis facing the local construction industry, to share the action taken by the Administration in order to provide outgoing Latiano a PUG, we should be approved, pending adoption of this document, development plan affecting areas of completion as "windmills," Biondo, Scaramouche and Salento away ... "

Unfortunately, their absence will have only one consequence: my question about what UDC think the merits of the subdivisions will remain an unsolved question. as well as the reason for their protest, but if they agree because now complain and do not participate, preclude, among other things, the possibility of protest in the appropriate forums?

Another paradox of the system to which we are sadly used. Ladies and gentlemen I present to you the policy.

Daniel

Tally7.2 Data To Tally 9

UNUSUAL BUT ... as nervousness ..........

Someone on his blog, believes that some action on the Web may be arising from a form of nervousness, however, derived from the provocations of this one ... It probably falls between these interventions "CONFUSED AND HAPPY" ... because - in reality - this is the action derived from the provocations of the above.

Too bad, I did not think have shown signs of nervousness, it even less thought to have been the author of angry actions. In fact, I was sure that I merely point out - in a calm - one of the many contradictions which we have become accustomed to some policy, especially the contradictions of a person who first said something and then it repeats another (the usual Italian history in other words). The lodgement of the "brick to your head" then do not even deserve to be commented on, although I could cite the still valid psychoanalytic theory of " projection.

In short, there will probably be nervous. But by whom and to whom remains to be determined ...

Daniel