E 'possible to summarize what happens in the political world by laying down some points that, regardless of the coalition that wins are almost always present, both locally and nationally: 1) a group of people decides to run for presenting its own program, and 2) during the election campaign the candidates illustrate the various points of the program, highlighting the positives, and 3) at the end of the campaign after the vote and the winners will forget the many programmatic points systematically described; 4) citizens begin right to criticize, accuse the winners of promise and not keep, 5) the opposition relies on the non-execution of program points; 6) people lost, and rightly so, faith in politics.
But what if the winners of the elections so generously, with unexpected alacrity, to perform various program points in the program? What happens when a new administrative team simply decided to keep its commitments to the citizen?
Simple ... is accused of excessive speed by those politicians who believe, apparently, more far-sighted and experts.
E 'success Latimer (BR) during the board of 25 October. The leader of the PDL Pine Christmas (he still ...) has accused us of being overly zealous in implementing our program, adding that he did not agree with several points in it ... For this force: the OUR program, not its ...
In light of the allegations Councillor Christmas I wonder, therefore we should adapt to the political world that we all know, implementing interventions promised slowly or perhaps not implementing at all, ending up being similar to those directors (national and local) that do nothing but alienate citizens from politics ...?
Well if that's what we are asked, but unfortunately we are forced to say no ... And not out of arrogance or superiority complexes different ... but only because we want to make the administration more efficient, more dynamic, more resolute, more citizen ...
We simply want to change the policy. With humility and seriousness ... but we want to change it ...
I sent to the managers of the Blog Viva Latiano the following letter: Dear
managers Viva Latimer
these days I was very careful reader of your Blog, the publication of the post dated 09/23/2010 (which had stated that as a result of the spill my councilor and advisor BLE DE FALCO by IDV, 621 voters were left without vocals) to the various interventions that have occurred . I decided to intervene, not to fuel the controversy, but just to clarify my remarks in this regard.
First let me emphasize that the question of the 621 voters did not see me without a voice in agreement. The one who wins the election goes to hold public office can not give an account only to their constituents, but must represent the entire community for which he served. E ' This is an important constitutional principle that every politician, "amateur" or professional who may be, must respect. The recent elections had at Latimer saw several lists get hundreds of votes, well, the voters of these lists, which effectively have no representation in the council, then citizens would have no voice? Each municipal council has a duty to listen and give voice to every citizen latianese, regardless of who has voted for.
should not be forgotten, moreover, that unlike the national elections - in which, due to an undemocratic electoral law, the voter chooses the symbol but not the parliamentary, but ... that will be chosen by party - in consultations administrative than the voter to mark a cross on the symbol writing near the candidate's name. So the people have chosen the first candidate and then, like automatic consequence, the party. IDV was not to allow us to achieve the result in question, but we were candidates for us to achieve this positive outcome to the party election.
are not citizens, therefore, but rather is the party of IDV to be left without a voice ... of course not responsible for that to be counted against us.
We left because we felt that by IDV in it, despite the emergence of a national coordination chaired by Tonino Conte, would never created a real dialectic nor a real climate of political confrontation. Besides the fact that your post is clearly directed the coordination of the party, responded first to Senator Caforio is rather indicative, do not you think?
Say no more. Anyone who knows me knows that I do not like asynchronous communication because it allows a real comparison in real time. For this reason I declare to be available to a public debate (on TV, radio or even in the streets) with the national secretary of IDV Tonino Conte.
But let me conclude with a final comment. In one of the interventions that followed your post, we were defined by Senator Caforio "amateur" in politics. I do not understand the meaning. Being the first administrative experience may exclude the presence of innovative ideas, enthusiasm and commitment? The parties, in training lists, should therefore expose the cartel "is just political candidates with experience"? IDV is not just to lead a strong parliamentary struggle that the political should not hold public office for more than two terms, so as not to allow the existence of professional politicians? Anyway, in the light of what today is the policy of "professional" - which does nothing but disappoint the people actually turn them away from the "reason of state" - I guess I be considered an "amateur" does not constitute the same offense. Indeed ...
