In recent days, the online journal of the South has published several unflattering press tones, De Giorgi in the administration. The criticism in question were produced by some members of the opposition (UDC and PD), some parties (Ecopacifisti and IDV) and association (the island that does not exist).
On March 3, as a member of the majority, I decided to respond to those attacks in order to clarify and express my point of view as well. Once the product release, I decided to send it by e-mail to various local press organizations, including - of course - the Journal of the South. Oh yes, I said, a newspaper so important can not guarantee the opportunity to be heard.
I was wrong.
While information sites " Latimer's voice" and " The Controvento.it "have published my statement, the Journal of the South had" strangely "ignored, in fact, denying the right of reply.
In recent days, the Journal of the South published online order (click on links to view articles): 1
Press Association that the island is not (against the "destruction caused by the urban administration") 02.24.2011
2 article by Franco Giuliano (on the lots and against the majority) containing statements Councillor PD Jewel (on the lots and against the majority). 26.02.2011
3 Council Press Argentieri (UDC) (in favor of the initiative and against the island that is not the majority). 28.02.2011
Article 4 containing statements by members of the island that there is (on the lots and against the majority) and the local IDV (on the lots and against the majority). 02.03. 2011
5 Press IDV produced by the local (on the lots and against the majority). 02.03.2011
many releases produced by the members of the majority (including myself), however, have been published? NO.
Why?
Franco Giuliano Perhaps because, besides being a reporter of the newspaper in question, it is also a member of Never Land ...
Perhaps because such "association" it seems that Julian was about to enter the field "to the recent elections ....
E 'sadly clear, therefore, that press against the administration De Giorgi can only come in handy. As it is clear that a response made by myself, or other favorable to the policy of the majority, can be terribly uncomfortable ...
I recall that it is not the first time something like this happens. A few months ago (during the creation of the special) were published online by the Journal reported a myriad of products from various members of the opposition, but on this occasion my statement, as well as those of other members of the majority , was put aside.
An irrefutable fact is also in the fact that from April 2010 to now, the online Journal of the South has published over 60 articles against the current majority, with an average about 6 per month. None in favor.
ALL THIS IS NOT 'RIGHT. A newspaper has to information. A newspaper has to ensure the right of reply. But above all, a newspaper should NEVER take sides or take a political position ...
regard to Neverland, I believe that its leaders should at least consider changing the name to "the association that is not" ... Why, in my opinion, this is not much of an association, now defined as a political movement, whose leader - Giuliano - use the pages of a newspaper, not to make information (as would be natural), but to do politics.
For heaven's sake, given its commitment, I can only give Giuliano welcome in the political arena, however, face a delight to all the latianesi: change tactics ...
... otherwise its really in danger of becoming a "journalistic mess "......
Daniel
0 comments:
Post a Comment